Aside from your maddening writing style (seemingly random periods, run-on sentences and nonsensical prose), your analysis is seriously flawed. If the company has no cash, why would a CEO/CFO stay unless he were getting paid? I have to assume that the shares were vested early so the guy can get some income while the reorganization and financing are being finalized. Everyone knows that a CEO, whether interim or otherwise, cannot change the vesting of his shares unless he has approval of the board of directors, however small this group may be. Your implications and outright lies/guesses are outrageous. I look forward to new management, new financing and huge revenues when China approves our CGM for use.
