InvestorsHub Logo

EZ2

Followers 213
Posts 219142
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 03/31/2001

EZ2

Re: timhyma post# 116794

Tuesday, 11/29/2016 9:41:56 AM

Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:41:56 AM

Post# of 120381
Trump tweet: Flag burning must have 'consequences'
MARKETWATCH 9:40 AM ET 11/29/2016
President-elect suggests loss of citizenship as punishment

President-elect Donald Trump tweeted early Tuesday that burning the U.S. flag should have "consequences," suggesting loss of citizenship or a year in jail as punishment.

Trump's tweet runs up against two Supreme Court decisions that have affirmed the right to desecrate the flag: one in 1989 and another the following year.

( )

Trump's transition spokesman, Jason Miller, was asked about the rulings on CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/29/ politics/donald-trump-flag-burning-penalty-proposal/) Tuesday but did not respond to questions about the constitutional protections of flag burning. "Flag burning should be illegal," Miller said repeatedly.

While the Supreme Court has upheld flag burning as a right, another challenge could turn out differently depending on Trump's choice of justices. The high court is currently operating one member short of its full nine, following the death of Antonin Scalia in February. Trump is expected to pick a replacement for Scalia, and perhaps for other justices, during his presidency.

Read:Here's who Trump may tap to tilt Supreme Court to the right (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-who-trump- may-tap-to-tilt-supreme-court-to-the-right-2016-11-09)

Flag desecration laws vary by country: it is illegal in China and North Korea, and also in democracies including Italy and Germany. Punishments include fines and jail time.

From the archive:Passion over flags extends far beyond the simmering Confederate flag controversy (http:// www.marketwatch.com/story/passion-over-flags-extends-far-beyond-the-simmering-confederate-flag-controversy-2015-06-23)

Congress debated the issue in 2006. Here's what Mitch McConnell, now the Senate majority leader, said at the time:

( )

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in the 1989 case Texas v. Johnson that flag burning was a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. In 1990, the court affirmed the right to burn the flag in the United States v. Eichman case. That ruling was also 5-4.

It was unclear what if anything had precipitated the Trump tweet.

-Robert Schroeder; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com


(END) Dow Jones Newswires
11-29-160940ET
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.