Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[McCull]

Randy Goulding does not have legal malpractice insurance.

I didn't say he was not a lawyer with a licence to practice in the State of Illinois in good standing.

All I said was that he does not have legal insurance.

Almost all lawyers carry legal/malpractice insurance such that if they mess up the company they represented, then the injured company can sue, obtain remedy, compensation from the lawyer's insurance company.

In the case of Sarissa and/or IGEX, who are both represented by Goulding (WTF?)and his firm Securities Counsellors, neither company would have that option because Randy Goulding does not carry malpractice/legal insurance. Perhaps, he is considered uninsurable because he went to the federal pen in the 90's for money laundering?

Follow the link or see below:
https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=785186624


LAWYER SEARCH: ATTORNEY'S REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY RECORD
ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of November 18, 2016 at 1:27:47 PM:

Full Licensed Name: Randall S. Goulding
Full Former name(s): None
Date of Admission as Lawyer
by Illinois Supreme Court: May 19, 1978
Registered Business Address: Securities Counselors Inc.
1333 Sprucewood Ln
Deerfield, IL 60015-4771
Registered Business Phone: [phone]
Illinois Registration Status: Active and authorized to practice law - Last Registered Year: 2016
Malpractice Insurance:
(Current as of date of registration;
consult attorney for further information) In annual registration, attorney reported that he/she does not have malpractice coverage. (Some attorneys, such as judges, government lawyers, and in-house corporate lawyers, may not carry coverage due to the nature of their practice setting.)
Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings:
Case(s) below are identified by caption and Commission case number. If there is more than one case, the cases are listed in an order from most recent to oldest. A case may have more than one disposition or more than one component to a disposition, in which situation each disposition and component is also listed separately within that case record, again in an order from most recent to oldest.

Click on Rules and Decisions ("R & D") to access any documents regarding this lawyer that are in Rules and Decisions. R & D contains all disciplinary opinions of the Supreme Court and most other Court orders and board reports issued since 1990. If R & D does not contain the decision that you are seeking, contact the Commission's Clerk's office for assistance. Contact information for the Clerk's office is available at Office Hours.

In re Randall S. Goulding, 92CH0580
Disposition: Interim suspension until further order of Court during pendancy of disciplinary proceedings
Effective Date of Disposition: June 24, 1994
End Date of Disposition: March 21, 1997
Definition of Disposition: An interim suspension reflects the determination of the Supreme Court that a lawyer should be suspended during the pendency of a disciplinary proceeding. In imposing interim suspension, the Court orders that the lawyer be suspended until further order of the Court and may impose such conditions as the Court deems necessary. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the interim suspension. The Court may terminate the interim suspension upon imposition of final discipline or under other circumstances as the Supreme Court deems just.
In re Randall S. Goulding, 91CH0208
Disposition: Suspension for a specified period
Effective Date of Disposition: June 24, 1994
End Date of Disposition: June 24, 1998
Definition of Disposition: Suspension for a specified period reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.