Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:36:46 PM
We now know why the appeal has not been filed -- Rule 59 motion.
In addition, I wish I knew what the new Federal Circuit directive was ( ... but also based on the logic of new Federal Circuit law. ...). The lynch pin of McKinney's ruling was a document that referenced testing the technology that McKinney chose to interpret as an offer to sell (thereby invalidating the patents and leading to inequitable conduct on GERS' and C&C's part). Based on the fragments we have in the new filing the new Federal Circuit directive likely addresses this issue generally and does so in a way favorable to GERS.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM