Tornado Alley (PROG)

[JimLur]

http://canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/Federal_Law_Hillary_Clinton_bw161030.pdf?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=cff02c3805-CFP+Daily+Mailout&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d8f503f036-cff02c3805-297721681&mc_cid=cff02c3805&mc_eid=3d4df0f0cc

Follow the link as everything didn't paste.


October 30, 2016
Basis for the Indictment and Criminal Conviction of Hillary Rodham Clinton
for Crimes Against the United States
Background:
With the release of “tens of thousands” (FBI source, unconfirmed) of newly discovered emails that were
found on four different devices in connection with a criminal investigation of Huma Abedin’s estranged
husband, Anthony Weiner, on Friday, October 28, 2016, FBI Director James Comey communicated written
notice to members of Congress
that he has reopened the criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of
private nonsecure email servers and devices to conduct official business of the United States.
At least one of the four relevant devices discovered belonged to Clinton’s closest associate, Huma Abedin,
and one device belonged to Anthony Weiner (ownership and nature of the other two devices was not
revealed).
Given the timing of Comey’s action a mere 11 days before election day, it is clear that the materials
discovered are very likely to contain new and very strong evidence likely to prove sufficient to warrant an
indictment of Hillary Clinton and a number of her associates for violations of federal laws including those
governing espionage and the legal requirements for due diligence with the protection of national security
and classified information.
Where criminal intent is required, proof of criminal intent is established by:
(1) Making false exculpatory statements
or
(2) Destroying evidence
Such actions clearly indicate knowledge of criminal activity and an attempt to conceal such activity.
Several of the more severe violations of Federal Law cited below require neither intent nor knowledge of
criminal activity by those committing the crime. Nevertheless, there is a compelling preponderance of
evidence that demonstrates proof of criminal intent by both Hillary Clinton and her associates.
Throughout her tenure as Secretary of State
Clinton conducted official government business on nonsecure
private email servers and devices which included the transmission and receipt of highly sensitive classified
material.
When confronted with questions about her use of such devices, Clinton repeatedly denied she had ever
used such devices for official government business and, in particular, she claimed no documents marked
classified had been sent or received from her personal email devices.
When pressed about classified documents being sent and received on her nonsecure private email
devices, Clinton responded by lying, dissembling, or both. On several occasions when Clinton claimed she
had neither sent nor received documents marked classified she was not denying the documents were not
classified, just that they were not marked classified, hoping the distinction would be lost on her supporters.
If senders remove classified markings prior to illegally making electronic copies and sending the material
by nonsecure email, the documents are still classified.
Clinton’s original security briefing and annual follow-up briefings informed her that she was responsible for
recognizing classified material whether or not it was marked or officially categorized as such after its
Page