InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 91
Posts 13604
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/09/2003

Re: BullNBear52 post# 259745

Saturday, 10/29/2016 8:02:53 PM

Saturday, October 29, 2016 8:02:53 PM

Post# of 482910
Julian Assange may be a villain, but he did some good by informing America about the Clintons’ pay-to-play deal. One revelation from the WikiLeaks trove of John Podesta’s e-mails stands out as more serious than all the others: Hillary Clinton attempted to solicit a $12 million donation to the Clinton Foundation from the Moroccan government, agreeing to a personal appearance in exchange for the money, against her own staff’s objections before backing out at the last minute. The discovery that Clinton, between her time as secretary of state and as a presidential candidate, asked for a ten-figure sum from an overseas government in exchange for a personal appearance is more than troubling: It’s so vivid a demonstration of her moral blindness that it almost makes WikiLeaks look like the hero in this story. A lot of what we’ve learned from the Podesta e-mails confirmed everyone’s worst suspicions..........Clinton soliciting large sums from a foreign government to her personal foundation right before she runs for president is something else entirely: It looks a lot like a future commander-in-chief asking for a bribe, which is why so many Clinton campaign staffers objected to it loudly, early, and often. An e-mail from Huma Abedin makes clear that this was initiated by Hillary Clinton herself:

CGI also wasn’t pushing for a meeting in Morocco and it wasn’t their first choice. This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The exchange also suggests that Clinton’s staff recognized how bad this would look, but the candidate herself wanted to go forward with it. At times her most loyal employees seem exasperated with her refusal to heed their warnings. “She created this mess and she knows it,” Abedin concludes the e-mail. Both the Moroccan government and OCP, the government-owned mining company that paid for what was ultimately a meeting with Bill and Chelsea Clinton — they were sent after Clinton staffers determined that a meeting with Hillary was too big a PR risk — have been cited for human-rights abuses. “You’ve heard of blood diamonds, but in many ways you could say that OCP is shipping blood phosphate,” Representative Joe Pitts of Pennsylvania, Republican co-chair of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, has said. How likely is it that President Hillary Clinton’s administration would rebuke the state-owned company or the Moroccan government?

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441456/

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.