if you read the filings roche has been on RVUE's board since march of 2012, before CEO pacchini ever came aboard. logic suggests roche brought in pacchini.
then, in subsequent filings they detailed a plan of RVUE growing revenues, then getting bought out. do a word search here for buyout and you'll find those docs. salary incentives were (and still are) in place for revenue targets.
i tend to think roche is a methodical guy and wouldn't bumble his way through a process like this.
he paid well over $1M to pay off note holders and then take control here. every month, about $90K.
then suddenly we're dark.
in a default on this $200K loan roche now takes RVUE out from under us? i doubt it. what's illogical about this is why did roche pay so dearly up until now? why not just issue the $200K loan months ago, for the default, and then take ownership?
i think what's more likely is roche, his family (ivue holdings 18M shares), and all the commons, will do fine when they're done here. imo the reason for going dark was so the resurrection could happen with less retail shareholder scrutiny, and more quickly from the standpoint of regulators.
just a wild guess.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
