InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 168
Posts 21345
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2006

Re: Nowak488 post# 43424

Wednesday, 10/26/2016 12:58:54 PM

Wednesday, October 26, 2016 12:58:54 PM

Post# of 47873
I side with it being the lowball pricing. I think PP didn't like that because it made a big payoff much less likely, as we (so far) have now seen.

It had to have been a very difficult decision to lower the price so much, but who knows what rumors ISC was hearing about competing tech, non-rad, etc..? They risked bankruptcy without getting the TSA deal. Tough call. I think they should have priced it at over 30k a unit and said to hell with the rumors - take it or leave it, and let the chips fall where they may. They had to have a way out. But, that's armchair analysis--reality was more complicated, I'm sure.

ECAC seemed to have saved our bacon but it really just prolonged the agony.

TSA delays though were really inexcusable. They had the most control of all in our outcome. Everything would have been different had they not dragged their feet for so long.


For microcap opportunities in the hot Virtual Reality sector, see my board

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.