Play-For-Pay Dilution
The price is starting to faulter. But I don't want to use that to support my opinion. I don't want to use price weakness as a weapon to support my views. When the pps is up, some suggest that certain "strong hands" are supporting the price. And vice versa. Even though that's probably not the case at all. And some would argue that it would be illegal to do so.
Look, all of these CEO's go to the same CEO school. And all of their attorneys follow the same play book. It's my opinion, through research, DD, and over 30 years of experience... that clever money-making "hush-hush" dilution is the ultimate name of the game here.
It is very obvious to me that the ATM has been fired-up for months. Plus, the dilutiive financing through notes and warrants, etc. The RED FLAG was that nobody would dare bring up these issues until just a couple weeks ago. And these issues have been on my radar for several months.
Also, it is very dangerous when only one investment company holds over 80% of ALL the institutional holdings. And who knows how much they may have sold recently.
The most recent period says that there have been :
27 DECREASED POSITIONS - that's 2 times the increased.
18 SOLD OUT POSITIONS - that's almost 4 times the new.
So how could that be? With the same news in that same time period? And then months later that same, and only, news was then used over and over again ad nauseum, with a few SA articles thrown in for a little spice, with a cleverly hooked-up support staff on social media. And there really hasn't been much news, or any "unexpected" follow-up news, since then. Really.
It's a form of - "Play-for-Pay" - dilution.
JMO
