Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[Protector]

ku, the CA proves otherwise. If Garnick was only a consultant with no function responsibility then he CANNOT be held responsible for the issuing of PRs.

Hence PACER shows Garnick was listed and had to power to hold the 2012 Chicago PR. Only PPHM could in SECOND ORDER, file against Garnick if they would have tough that his consultancy services were not performed properly and resulted in the release of the PR.

In the STRICT administrative term of CONSULTANT you are correct. Garnick will without ANY DOUBT invoice his services. However, unless it is different in the US, here externals can hold ALL functions in a company even CEO, let alone consultant.

SO you must split that "way of employing" from the "function and responsibility held".