InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 2529
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/17/2013

Re: BP_1 post# 33760

Saturday, 10/22/2016 3:42:53 PM

Saturday, October 22, 2016 3:42:53 PM

Post# of 57482

1% in Bigger. I am pretty much convinced he is not the one who will be able to take the AOT to the promise land.


Last time around it was Kyte who was inept, and Beggar was the savior.. It ain't gonna make a dif. If this was remotely interesting to any company, it wouldn't matter how much of a moron the CEO was unless he actually sabotaged sales intentionally.

But now they use an even stronger term, definitively confirmed or something like that.



"something like that" lol? Why not the exact phrase? Still, he only talks about reducing viscosity, and as usual, NEVER anything about commercial viability, savings.. ANYTHING like that because either he doesn't know due to this thing never being tested fully, or he knows but is just sticking to reporting viscosity to stay above the SEC and let shareholders assume away the incorrect conclusion.

Anyone care to explain what may be going on?


Hah hah hah.. well as predicted, the ones buying in north america (ooohhhh... around 6 months ago on a 6 month lockup) that don't have the same hoops to jump through as the REG S chumps have converted their $0.10 shares and are liquidating before the impending loss, or time they won['t be able to when liquidity dries up due to no more buyers. This will hit $0.01 within a month. The facebook group didn't discuss this? Funny this was predicted here to happen this month.

Some may respond and argue the shares cannot be resold into the market without great difficulty.


REG S conversion is difficult for those that bought overseas.. part of the reason why Beggar and Kyte sold so many over there vs here.. this whole things has been planned for a while and executed with intent. Now they are selling locally (we will see what percentage in the next Q vs overseas) those buyers can convert easier.

Sure sure, it's all just an elaborate scheme to defraud shareholders right?


Aaaaaand all the previous products worked right?
NEXT!
Newsflash, 99% of companies on the OTCBB are scams and pump and dumps.

one seller who has pushed us down from .15 to .10. If one seller can do this then one buyer can push it up just as easy.


Then try. See how many brokers are waiting with hidden massive sell orders off the listing so they don't spook the average shareholder.. try.. see how high it gets.

By the way my buying at 0.0997 brought the price up 30% from 0.07


It didn't bring the price up if the bid is still the same lol! However, you just booked a 30% paper loss instantly, soon to be a real loss.

Funny how these pennies always according to bagholders are the fault of 'naked short sellers'.. never management.. oh no.. can't be their lies or that they ran a scam.. it always ends up being the shorters lol!

..As I am dis the math and a couple of hundwred bucks after the fees are just not worth it...


The point is, it wouldn't be worth it. There isn't enough volume. The issue with shorting is you always have to buy back in to cover. Big question is, why so little volume? Who actually got most of the REG S warrants overseas outside of the small timers who have by now given up on even converting?

QS lawyers buried the initial whinge


Only thing getting buried is the PPS!

If I was private equity or an oil company, or a country, I would jump on the company at these prices!


Hah hah hah! Ya... sure.. for a company that has never really made a dime in 16 years, 8 failed devices, and a flagship device that has never run a full suite of tests.. You can lead a horse to water I guess.

the value engineered AOT has documented efficacy across the full spectrum of grades of crude oil, from super heavy bitumen to super lightweight and ultralight condensates.


AMAZING! The 'value paq' AOT version was only pre-tested on the KMI line for what.. 24 hours? And was NEVER tested on any other line, including the TCPL line. Did they pump Bitumen through the KMI line during that time as well?? Wow! ROTFLMAO! So obviously they are only referring to sample testing, because the TCPL test was a failure. And who "documented" it? Beggar? Who cares!! Amazing.. simply amazing.
Efficacy of what exactly? Why is that never defined? Of course he had to throw in the "samples" part because then he can again say they saw a viscosity reduction which is something that has been known for north of 80 years now.. just more red herring thrown out to be gobbled down and insinuations drawn with a bad case of indigestion!

A permanent installing with Kinder Morgan imo is imminent.


Before even testing it fully? Ya.. ok.. tick-tock.. time is running out.. as predicted, as stated, as coming true.

A sale of 10 units to Iraq puts this stock at $1.00 to $2.00 on standard valuation alone not including the future potential of sales to any other oil company


Come on Sano.. no reply necessary lol! Does anyone believe Iraq and ETPG are remotely legit? lol! I mean POOR Michael Lynch!! How could he possibly be dealing with Iraq when

The report from KNH, dated January 8, stated that Lynch was undergoing follow-ups following a craniotomy due a head injury, that caused him not to be fully oriented to time, space and people.


SOunds like a problem afflicting most shareholders!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSEP News