InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 37
Posts 36554
Boards Moderated 13
Alias Born 10/20/2002

Re: Hanibal post# 258604

Thursday, 10/20/2016 1:45:34 PM

Thursday, October 20, 2016 1:45:34 PM

Post# of 483018
Even These Extremely Partisan Republicans Disavow Trump's Refusal to Accept the Election Results

When Laura Ingraham abandons you, you may have gone too far.

By Elizabeth Preza / AlterNet
October 20, 2016

Criticism continues to mount against Donald Trump for his refusal to say he would accept the results of the election. But while some of his more unhinged supporters, like Sarah Palin, insist Trump's failure to accept the legitimacy of the election would betray those who "died' for freedom, other prominent Republicans are despondent over their nominee's response last night.

Sen. Lindsey Graham

Graham, who's been a staunch critic of the Republican nominee since the Republican primaries, slammed Trump for his coy refusal to accept the results of the election outright. In a statement, Graham said he has "confidence in our democracy and election system," adding Trump "is doing the party and country a great disservice by continuing to suggest the outcome of this election is out of his hands and 'rigged' against him."

"If he loses, it will not be because the system is 'rigged' but because he failed as a candidate," Graham added.

Laura Ingraham


The conservative commentator and strident Trump supporter also took issue with the Republican nominee's suggestion that he may not accept the outcome of the election, tweeting "there is no other option unless we're in a recount again."

He should have said he would accept the results of the election. There is no other option unless we're in a recount again.
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) October 20, 2016

But Ingraham's criticism of the candidate stopped there. Like many Trump apologists, she argued "many of Clinton's supporters questioned the legitimacy of George W. Bush's presidency for 8 years after the recount.," which of course isn't the same thing as a candidate outright refusing to accept the election results.

Steve Schmidt

Schmidt, a Republican strategist, told MSNBC Wednesday that Trump's remark was "a disqualifying moment," adding "it's a clear and present danger to our constitutional order, to the republic."

“It’s unprecedented in this history of the country," he continued. "Constitutional officers like Paul Ryan are now at an hour where they’re called to step forward, to exhibit political courage, to put the country first and to communicate very clearly that we have legitimate elections in this country and that is how we choose our leaders.”

Michael Steele

Steele, who served as the first black chairperson of the Republican National Committee, criticized Trump on Twitter, writing "his answer inflicts serious damage to his campaign," adding "in the end the American people want to know if you can be a good loser."

Charles Krauthammer

Speaking with Fox News Wednesday night, the conservative commentator called Trump's refusal to accept the election a "terrible mistake."

"This is political suicide," he added.

Krauthhammer said while Americans want change, "they don’t want a radical that will challenge the foundations of the Republic."

"Yes, you criticize conditions," he continued. "You’re going to change Washington, etc. But you don’t challenge the legitimacy of an election and hold up the prospect of actual nonacceptance. And when he did that, I think it was a terrible mistake.”

Hugh Hewitt


While Hewitt, a conservative commentator, thought Trump "won 14 of 15 rounds," he said the Republican candidate "hit himself on the head and himself out" with his "rigged election" talk.

"It is outside the norm of American political rhetoric to express a contingent acceptance of the result," Hewitt said.

“The contingent nature of his commitment to the results is unsettling to many people," he observed.

The Republican National Committee

Republican National Committee communications director Sean Spicer seemed to throw cold water on the notion of a contested election, insisting "this won't be an issue" because Trump is going to win the election.

“But regardless, ya know, we’re going to accept the results and the will of the people,” Spicer said, insisting Trump will “accept the results of the election 100 percent.”

Elizabeth Preza is an AlterNet staff writer focusing on politics, media and cultural criticism. Follow her on Twitter @lizacisms.

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/republicans-disavow-trumps-refusal-accept-election-results

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.