InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 435
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 295220

Wednesday, 10/19/2016 7:36:42 AM

Wednesday, October 19, 2016 7:36:42 AM

Post# of 312015
PTOI's (stock) perversions re: data *reported* have been in place since *post set up* of 2011 .. and overlapping
*efforts* of 2012 ~

CEs' kill order kicked in after PTOI was last illegally orchestrated UP in Jan 2013
(CE's dilemma then was 1.50 to 1.65 .. which is why *take UP* was stopped out @ 1.49)

it's been 3 years and 10 months since then

and it's been 3 years and 2 months since P2O (company) was wrested back in mid August 2013


and it's why 4 price points matter
with every appearance on tap (VNDM's abusive *efforts* just this month)
of 5c being the CEs' *new* 10c ..

how amusing to er .. *believe* .. that *transparency* existed then re: OTC .. it would be side splitting
if it weren't so damn disgusting and sickening just how many totally legit OTC companies have been
targeted for CEs' cycles of money b4 being obliterated and destroyed for profit

as noted frequently .. CEs' *show* what they want .. when they want .. but with *access* re: PTOI
slowly but surely being reduced re: *new* decoys .. and P2O on the verge of their first sale of their
disruptive technology .. it is moving ever closer to game .. set .. match

as i've noted previously CEs' days of making stats up or not reporting at all *diminish* going forward
(just me but as i've also noted *b4* .. expect more and more T Trades to *show* with legit volume
that .. as observed just yesterday .. will be handled by both *resets* and *elastic* efforts for NN)

on avg .. imo *legit* is running approx 20% .. bogus/resets and abusive is running approx 80%

btw .. i noted in late 2010 .. that on avg CEs were *working* 1 legit to 3 bogus .. so this isn't *new*
which of course is a significant part of the CEs' problems due to P2O's ability to actually *SURVIVE*
CEs' every effort to kill off the company by massively and illegally manipulating the stock (cycle of $$$)

with P2O's ability to execute (filings and that FORM D updated) .. that % *cant* be maintained by CEs
and their NON RETAIL BOSSES

===


imo 5c is the new 10c .. :)



===

.. CEs' (NON RETAIL) show what they want .. when they want ..

but i highly doubt with the last round of material events' filed by P2O .. carried forward .. PTOI goes backward

depending on what is filed next .. i can actually see a partially laddered cover with *volume* of significance

think of dominoes ..

imo if first sale is to a *known* entity .. i won't be surprised if every *legit* (vs bogus) GTC visible via l3
is gone in a *nano* second .. ;)

but i'd also remind all about *price points* of *significance* re: PTOI and CEs' embedded since 2009


as i keep noting .. there are 4 price points for PTOI that will be worth observing/documenting
>> and i'm not ruling out on PTOI that 5c is the new 10c for NN's non retail bosses .. which certainly
seems to be the case after the last *rounds* via those UC and always elastic asks .. ;)

first 3 ~



10c ~ closing PPS on 12.31.13 .. *volume* over last 3 years/8 months = 71.1M
20c ~ original CE almost *lost* 19c with 5 & 10 year NYS permits' issued Summer 2014
35c ~ closing PPS on 9.30.13 with current CEO's $Millions infused


fourth pertains to $1.50 - $1.65 .. just a reminder PTOI's last illegally orchestrated RUN UP
was done in Jan 2013 and *stopped out @* .. $.1.49 ..



and 4 reasons why


1 ~ founder's tech not only works .. but it is disruptive across multiple levels
2 ~ current ceo has infused $Millions .. and most recently has *connections*
that added $200,000 .. which buys P2O into 2017 for time lines to *align*
3 ~ actual P2O investors .. many (not all) of whom have never sold one share
considering PTOI has been *trading* since April 2009 .. that *reality* presents
one hell of a problem for those who do illegally manipulate OTC stox by rote
considering PTOI's actual share structure .. with P2O's ability to execute
4 ~ P2O has numerous options .. specific to the company's future *location/s*
(among other aspects) .. which is why imo it's never wise to insist *outcome*
is known on any aspect pertaining to P2O .. only current mgmt knows the path
being *specifically* pursued .. and they aren't exactly the chatty type



http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125403648

it will certainly be revealing to see whose beliefs prove *real* with P2O's material events' 8k'd

hmmmm



4kids

10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --