'The notion is, on its surface, ridiculous. Either information is lost or it isn't. Trammel may have software which can create new tones which may or may not match the ones which were discarded during encoding, but without independent testing it's impossible to know how accurate they are.'
Oddly as you've mentioned, you're short this POS while I'm neither, disagreement runs heavily when flipping right or left. Hence seldom eye to eye are we.
Yet, I'm not a sound engineer too. Are you?
Regardless, in essence, when I listened to the whole assertion ScrewU makes in Trammel's magical sound transformation, I surmised the exact same thing.. "Big friggen deal" "you can't produce lost data that doesn't exist in a sound track in the 1st place."
Nor am I a music buff, but owned a few equalizers, more than 1 or two, and that was before digitalized music. Equalizing sounds the old fashioned way, bending a tube's electronic bandwidth, as it were, or an potentiometer's scale. Then at the opening of the internet the opportunity to acquire free digitalizers and equalizers what? in essence you're tweaking to a personal desired balance.
using multiple data codacs in an attempt to create the sound you either believe might be if you're there, live, or how it was originally tracked. an attempt to create imaginary effects.
None of this, like Trummel's program can 'Imagine' as it were, or retain lost memory and or data that's not original, sound. Might be able to tweek it to a personal satisfaction, but, produce what's not there, impossible.
yet, as mentioned, there are 1,000's of products claiming too; 'Bring back that lovin' feeling 'cause it's gone, gone, gone'
Of the absolute stupidest tricks I've seen, other than multiples of BS, 'As seen on TV' ads of exaggeration, hype and cons of fake sales price to dupe you into paying 2-3-4 and more the offer. Is the dumb A.. MAXD page illustrating your original digitalized sound is just flat, plain, dull, 'forgot its programming' and yet with just a twist of an dam equalizer, it's suddenly wonderful!..MAH, HA! HA!.
Now I don't know either, if that BS program was made by a true wizard right out of a Harry Potter screen, who's magically recalling sounds that are not there in the first place. However, I know a pitch and switch BS advertisement when I see one. And that 'Wizards' who conjure up spit from thin air are only in fairy tales. .
I do think that Trammel can tweak spit to presumable extremes. Is likely a sound engineer and purported to be of the best. I do have faith in Trammel's musical, Craftsmanship, or artistry in mixing and engineering live sound. creating original unadulterated tracks with existing data retained. A Virtual 'wizard' but, nobody can pool lost data from a place it doesn't exist. Least not unless the memory within such programming contains every dam original song or sound track and hundreds of thousands multiples, millions perhaps 100's of billions too! Using algorisms capable replicating such sound's original equipment's high and low extreme variables, the top through bottom of the equilibrium ever created. If ya aint got an supercomputer to process the amount of data in just the songs through history, and then the various original equipment emitters stacked in bounds of memory, it didn't even get close.
hence while I'm not an engineer of sound, pushing recorded sound through a mixer and or equalizer. Even some type of programming, or algorism in recent times, I do not intentionally seek, my ignorant knowledge and lack of being a Music buff does not preclude me from understanding the difference between reality and Magic.
Nor does it appear 'unique'. It's just bending, exaggerating or tweaking sound waves, which is little different than most anything availed in today's digital and algorism-ised world.
They're all doing the exact same thing. Attempting to take original data and enhance it to 'sound like' it can replicate what's not there. "Big friggen deal!"
