Wednesday, October 19, 2016 12:25:04 AM
I don't intend to dismiss your opinion. If Trammel showed you something which you liked the sound of, then no one can say you're wrong.
The business issue is: there's lots of ways to improve how something sounds, and very few of them are patentable let alone profitable.
Even though the music industry is fertile for snake oil (e.g., "96k" recordings, 'oxygen free" cables, etc.) you still need to convince either snobby audiophiles, or naive regular people, that this program improves their music in a way which other programs cannot... which is really hard to do when so many competitors are trying to trick people exactly the same way.
Bottom line is: Trammel's patent solves a problem that doesn't exist. And you can't make money off of that.
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Accelerates Creation of AI-Powered Platform to Revolutionize Patient Care • AVAI • Sep 24, 2024 8:00 AM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM