Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:14:56 PM
Thats pretty obviously insider info being leaked to a few.
Even backed by third party verifiable dates.
But a prior insider putting out info not publically known is not illegal. It must be material. Which means it would change the average shareholders trading patterns.
Something like leaking the spin out could get someone in trouble (and might) but telling about a deal from years ago that never came to pass is not illegally leaking insider info.
Unless you think knowing that Dan didnt take a deal years ago would change someones trading.
I cant see that though.
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM