InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 6406
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2011

Re: None

Sunday, 10/16/2016 8:12:07 AM

Sunday, October 16, 2016 8:12:07 AM

Post# of 52841
One of the critical facts in this outcome (note date of article):
The Summary judgement was issued the Indianas District Court on October 23, 2014. It was ruled in the defendants favor, that the corn oil extraction patent numbers 7,601,858 and 8,168,037 and those issued to GS CleanTech, were not valid. GreenShift appealed the summary judgment decision and won.

There were concerns that these patent applications were invalid, and the case was ruled against GreenShifts subsidiary, GS CleanTech. However, an appeal of the ruling by Greenshift led to a re-examination of each of the allowed patent applications as well as other affidavits and testimonials filed by the defendants. After the review, a different examiner declared that the patents were patentable and GreenShift was issued with allowances on these patent applications.

June 13, 2016


http://pinksheetpress.com/2016/06/13/the-u-s-patent-and-trademark-office-issues-greenshift-corp-otcmktsgers-with-notices-of-allowances-on-its-three-patents/