Tornado Alley (PROG)

[conix]

And who said that crime never pays....?

The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest.

For those of you interested in DIY (Do It Yourself):

1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case, the Clintons set it up in Canada.

2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did a contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. Right?

3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation. (check the Foundation filings).

4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors. (Prohibits? How convenient.)

5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate "good works" programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on fund lavish travel subsidize the Clintons lifestyle etc. Again, virtually tax free, which means you and I are underwriting it.

6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best and presumably competent accountants, somehow fails to report much of these details on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Net result?: Foreign money goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.

The Canadian "charity" includes as a principal named Frank Giustra. You may find a Google search to be enlightening. He is the "investor" who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. Uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia . This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. No proof of a quid pro quo, but curiously coincidental, no?

Can you just imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. He was convicted because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not proven to be illegal on appeal and understandably discomfiting, but still not exactly putting U.S. Security at risk by irresponsibly setting up a pro-actively concealed e-mail server.

Questions that all voters should ask:

Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly (or to more local organizations) to the people, organizations and countries in need?

This is the very definition of money laundering and influence peddling. To not even require Clinton to testify under oath (like McDonnell did) is beyond the pale.

Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take. She had no choice. And as more of these e-mails are revealed, it gets worse--and hampers her campaign.

Hillary should be leading 80% to 20% against Trump. The only reason she is not is because a majority of voters DO NOT TRUST her after 30 years of being in the public eye.