Friday, September 30, 2016 2:10:05 PM
What MST accomplished was to take a potential competitor over and gain a small amount of market share. In the case of ZNGA, EA would get more into coming revolution of mobile gaming/gambling (particularly as states rights of such are allowed and becomes both paid form and taxable).
Further, the cadre of former EA employees makes it hard for a competitor to EA to attempt to take over ZNGA. And, all EA really has to do is buy say 5-10% of ZNGA common shares and get a board member on the BOD which would allow them(EA)to virtual control the direction of ZNGA software development. <---by following this
type of process . . . EA can evade having to buyout ZNGA formally, yet informally both can do join development, etc.
Thus a EA buy of ZNGA common also would by-pass ZNGA having to go to banks, etc. to get a loan to expand and redirect its SW expansion. Not to mention, EA has the big foot-in-the-door at domestic mega stores and on line sellers.
Are not both Silicon Valley Culture boys and girls?
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM