InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 253
Posts 2747
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2006

Re: chimaster post# 463559

Friday, 09/30/2016 10:35:28 AM

Friday, September 30, 2016 10:35:28 AM

Post# of 726852
No need. Your link cites a case which supports what I am saying. JPM did not buy these subsidiaries as a continuing business by merger and is not responsible for any underlying obligations not expressly assumed of those subsidiaries. It is not a successor in interest or. a successor/assignee which is a distinction that doesn't matter for my point. Since the rillions theory is based on this misunderstanding of the meaning successor , it falls by the wayside.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News