InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 139
Posts 15185
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 01/29/2002

Re: SFSecurity post# 41314

Wednesday, 09/28/2016 8:57:48 AM

Wednesday, September 28, 2016 8:57:48 AM

Post# of 47082
Hi Allen, Re: AIM and Sector ETFs............

AIMing sector ETFs is more trend following than "volatility capture". As
you've mentioned there's not a great deal of frequency or amplitude of
weekly or monthly price change for AIM to be busy. However, there's
price appreciation and in some cases there are dividends to be captured.

So, while not ideal AIM vehicles, sector ETFs aren't bad investments.
AIM acts to enhance sector ETF performance over time with its nominal
activity. It will still do the right thing at the right time.

Here's where my ETFs fall in a broad brush review:

Sector Position in Lichello Band
Large Cap US Nearer Sell
Healthcare Nearer Sell
Biotech Nearer Sell
Info Tech Nearer Sell
Financials Nearer Sell
Cons Discr Nearer Middle
Cons Staples Nearer Middle
Energy Nearer Middle
Industrials Nearer Middle
Utilities Nearer Middle
Gold Nearer Middle
Materials Nearer Middle
Region
Japan Nearer Sell
Pacific Rim Nearer Sell
Emerging Mkts Nearer Middle
Euro Zone Nearer Middle
Latin America Nearer Buy


(The Lichello band is the "Hold Zone" by a different name.)

Of thse ETF, only one is showing a 12 month loss (energy) and that one
only a small loss. Two are about break-even. All the rest are in
positive territory for the year-over year. In all there were 22 AIM
directed transactions in the last 12 months with a tilt toward buying
(accumulating). In the last six months there have been no buys, and
several sells (distribution). The last two months have been essentially
"hold" only.

Hope this helps!

Best regards,

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.