Mind1, I understand I said hope.... Do I base my decision to stay an investor in this company on hope alone? Simple answer is no. You are correct that all of the factors you have listed are important and it would be foolish to overlook those. I take into account all that has occurred or not occurred since I have been an investor...and I still choose to invest in this company and accept the risk of failure or the success based on the technology itself and the management of this company. I think KW has performed a good job , not great, at attempting to move this forward. He has with help of many others, moved this company into a better direction than any other CEO had previously accomplished and I do not think he or the technology is ready to throw in the towel without giving the KO blow to whatever they choose to attack. I cannot find any thing anywhere that can refute this technology and that is why I am staying. Even beyond my personnel dealings with loved ones suffering, I have hope this can be a technology to cure or prolong life with the disease. Of course there is Diabetes I would love to see cured as well. This may be the best technology to solve these problems and it may not be. What I do not understand is why a bigger company did not swoop in and snatch this up before now. I would love to have a one on one with Dr. Lohr and ask that question. In the video of him talking about his previous trials I always thank back to the man sitting on the corner with a coffee can in his hand and a sign by him stating "Meet the author of his own misfortune". What really happened????? That is the story I want to know. If it was a simple matter of the technology was not in place to provide consistent products, that's easy. We should have that fix now with Austianova. However, if there is something more sinister I want to find it. I have been unable to locate it. If you have something, please share!
