Monday, September 26, 2016 3:27:20 PM
I would agree. If you're judging these patents based on statements like that, trade shows, virtual offices, etc.
Sounds like you did the correct thing in selling.
Those that would rather base the value on the actual patents and things like the IPR response. Now, that's a different story.
After reading an amazingly put together IPR response, I personally am ok with them using the word goodies to reference the patents? That's just me though.
Still waiting on that negative on the IPR response. Amazing that nobody has spoken up yet. Maybe we do have the Goodies!!!!!
Recent VPLM News
- ILUS International Inc (ILUS) Sees 557% Q1 Revenue Increase, Begins National Exchange Uplist Procedure for Subsidiaries and Company • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 06/05/2023 12:15:00 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM