I can only imagine that the same derisive comments would be from the small segment of those who refer to GC as purposely printing shares for dilution, if it was early in the career of Ford, Bessemer, Drake, Hughes, Wright, Sikorsky, Piasecki and others whose inventions were eschewed until proven by persistence.
The fact be, that if such dissenters were so brave as to anonymously post derisive regurgitation of pseudo facts, why could they not display enough intelligence to define a correct and business savvy approach toward the success of the patented ideas? Or at least mention their success in the world of business?
I do not believe, for a moment, that those engaged in GC's near defamation, have any other credentials than those of typing on a keyboard.
Many who do follow this forum do have success in business, education, engineering, investment, invention, volunteering expertise, time & money to those of lesser or potential fortune.
I see GC as the quintessential determined inventor, maligned by some who may have the background to appreciate his task or pose constructive ideas for the furtherance of bonafide USA government approved & accepted patents but fail to assert themselves in a proactive manner.
Tis a shameful waste of one's intellect but that is what this forum will legally accept.
Therefore, I believe the forum is most helpful in allowing the identification (although protected by avatar anonymity) posters with a far more dim view of the patent holder than is warranted. IMO
