TOM since you put the issue in play again, I will inform you of my prospective and you and others can agree with me or disagree and I will apologize if warranted. Most of your points I will have to agree to disagree with as I think you are being finiky. And if finiky upsets you, so be it as it describes my opinion of some of you posts.
1. Perhaps dead wrong was obsessive and I apologize for it. If it will suit you sensibilities I will use just wrong when I show that a statement is fallacious.
2. I think the references in your last example were warranted given the extent of the inaccuracies I pointed out and how every. time he saw an article referencing a competitor he immediately would post the existence of deadly competition to arcam when they were not even producing the same item.
3. Bald statements. Guess you are ignorant of the term. Bald, not bold, means when a poster simply states a conclusion and does not provide authority or reasoning for such a conclusion. Such as He knows how many shares GE has. Or when anyone simply concludes such as arcam will not have good sales because of the lack of PRs. etc.
4. Hope you don't get attacked was totally justified. You and Charlie have both posted that they don't care about GE's vision or want posts to be resticted to arcam related stuff and yet frequently post non arcam related stuff. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander and if you attack others for that you should not do it yourself and you do. That is not derisive, its noting you hypociticalness. Especially when the post WAS arcam related as I showed.
Guess that addresses the points you made in detail. I've addressed many of these in greater detail in other posts and incorporate them herein by reference.
But I do apologize for my typing and sometimes lack of proofing as sometimes I have time constrains.
Bottom line, I disagree that my posts have been insulting, character assassination or the other adjectives you used. I would appreciate the comments of some others as to whether or why my language offends as I only intend to agree or disagree. And a little humor is not bad. Comments, but not from you TOm who obviously has an ax to grind as is hypocritical, frequently posting non arcam issues and attacking others for doing same.
Perhaps you might address the issues I raise rather than how I raise them.
Now lets focus on the main issues and leave this drivel alone.
