InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 472
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/30/2010

Re: newadventure post# 22124

Thursday, 09/22/2016 9:33:36 PM

Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:33:36 PM

Post# of 29974
It is beyond ridiculous to read the CDE reasoning on behalf of the Chilean Government with why Ricardo Lagos should not be questioned on his approval of the Pascua Lama Project while a court order was in place preventing the Government from doing just what they did.

We all know Ricardo Lagos and the CDE do not want to answer questions on Pascua Lama because they are guilty of ignoring the court of law. They are not arguing on the merits of Mr Lopehandia's case as his argument is solid legally.

The lack of claims for Barrick with Pascua Lama is nothing more then a huge wound to Barrick that can not be ignored any longer.

The BCSC has sided with Barricks fraud, they are recklessly hoping on Barricks fraud to continue or they can weasel out of any responsibility.





Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.