Monday, September 19, 2016 1:53:40 AM
-- in the case against Z, management was running out of cash, burning cash aggressively on intl litigation, and not really pursuing the ip issues in US but instead in foreign markets...
-- in the DTV case, management no longer is in a tight cash position, is no longer burning a lot on the litigation itself, and is pursuing its IP claims in US courts...
SO, it would stand to reason that management had a lot more leverage in the DTV settlement discussion (or at least a lot less urgency about settling) than in the Z case... I'm guessing that was clear to DTV too... Which maybe why they settled now...
This doesn't mean DTV will be paying $20m or more like Z did, but management clearly felt over a barrel in the Z litigation whereas that's unlikely to have been the case when they negotiated terms with DTV...
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM