Monday, September 19, 2016 1:53:40 AM
-- in the case against Z, management was running out of cash, burning cash aggressively on intl litigation, and not really pursuing the ip issues in US but instead in foreign markets...
-- in the DTV case, management no longer is in a tight cash position, is no longer burning a lot on the litigation itself, and is pursuing its IP claims in US courts...
SO, it would stand to reason that management had a lot more leverage in the DTV settlement discussion (or at least a lot less urgency about settling) than in the Z case... I'm guessing that was clear to DTV too... Which maybe why they settled now...
This doesn't mean DTV will be paying $20m or more like Z did, but management clearly felt over a barrel in the Z litigation whereas that's unlikely to have been the case when they negotiated terms with DTV...
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM