Thursday, September 15, 2016 2:37:45 PM
The term "avatar" in this case has been defined as 3D as per the markman hearing with judge Caspar in a district court of the United States of America. That information is publicly available on pacer.
Given that definition, it will provide a significant hurdle for BUNGIE to overcome at the ptab as witnessed in the oral hearings - one is welcome to read those transcripts to see the discussion in the hearing.
As most here are aware, it is up to BUNGIE to actually prove that wrong vs Wddd having to prove that definition correct. And given the judges comments on this it appears at least to an objective person that BUNGIE may actually not have done so!
Good luck!
Recent WDDD News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/19/2023 09:30:21 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/11/2023 06:34:14 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM