So OB 5 to 20 months has passed
Not sure why you say 5 to 20 months is possible, when we are at 23.5 now...
As stated, the possibility of a 5 or 20 month time to case disposition referred generally to the notion of a median time found in a distribution of months for a number of cases and not specifically to the Perry Appeal.
For example, there could be a distribution of say twenty-five civil cases with different months of reaching disposition.
5 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 13 13 14 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 20
In this hypothetical, the median time would be 12 months. So 5 or 20 months was used to indicate two ends of a hypothetical distribution since the federal court data did not present an actual distribution for examination or comparison, by say, type of case (civil, criminal), by month quarter or year, etc.
What you mwant was to discuss POST ARGUMENTS and those seem to be 3 to 12 months.
We probably could see another 7 months from the 5 we have witnessed.
7 months will be April 2017... not 2018 for those claiming that is the date.
There is no statistical or analytical method that I am aware of that can be used to accurately predict time to case disposition after filing notice or from any selected point of entry. Guessing, estimating, speculating, etc. is about the best that can be done here and away from the court.
Disappointed with Delaware - not sure where that goes from here.
Ky. goes with Lamberth
Del. goes there too?
What an insane world, since everyone has rebutted the Lamberth goals and the they lied to boot about the situation.
Sickening
What is being experienced is the level of judicial, analytical and intellectual acumen of lower court judges when faced with a complex task of untangling intent, violation of law, the mix of unconstitutional and ordinary government actions of the FHFA and Treasury occurring as a collusion in the conservatorships of the GSEs.
These cases require a nuanced, two-side approach to the law and events, keen investigation and research, integrity, common sense, honesty and dispassion.
This would lead to the crafting of intelligent arguments that include all of the facts of the cases in their respective contexts. This is not happening and the result is obvious.
