InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,048.42
(
-0.46%
)
US TECH 100
17,156.00
(
1.05%
)
Dow Jones
38,085.80
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
88.41
(
0.29%
)
Bitcoin
64,143.00
(
-0.53%
)
Post# of 4800
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

LarryAshy

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 35
Posts 1566
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/10/2014

LarryAshy

Re: Uranium post# 1387

Sunday, 09/11/2016 3:34:30 PM

Sunday, September 11, 2016 3:34:30 PM

Post# of 4800
Your welcome. Just putting out info and facts.

Dont forget #292...Order to show cause why an EC should not be appointed

ORDERED, that interested parties shall appear at a hearing and show cause as to why an official committee of equity security holders should not be appointed; and it is
hereby ORDERED



Seems the onus is on BBEP to show why one shouldn't be.

Thank goodness it is up to the Judge to make that decision, and not us here...huh? I'm not sure if I could handle the pressure...Just way too delicate.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up