InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 2067
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2011

Re: None

Wednesday, 08/31/2016 11:13:49 PM

Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:13:49 PM

Post# of 47790
According to https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B605jwjqJxMlRHlOWkJEdkVtY2M

On Oct 18, 2010, Exobox insider and then-current CEO Jack Cukjati issued himself 2,300,000 shares of common stock (stock cert C734).

On Oct 18, 2010, Exobox insider and then-current Secretary Carl Ulepich was issued 500,000 shares of common stock (stock cert C735).

No SEC Form 4s can be found regarding these stock issuances.

See, https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001335002&type=&dateb=&owner=include&count=40



Shaun Irvine supposedly issued himself 5,000 shares of newly created Series D stocks on January 29, 2014.

See, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335002/000100233414000006/f8kacquisition.htm

Where is his SEC Form 4 ???




Also !!!!!, according to Exobox's Stock Transfer agent as of May 12, 2010, there were 489,151,313 shares Outstanding with only 500,000,000 Authorized. See, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B605jwjqJxMlR3BsY2RHMFY2dFE

However, I believe only after January 2012 did former Exobox CEO truly retire the 100,000,000 shares of stocks that were returned to the company as stated in the Handover Agreement, see https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B605jwjqJxMlM245MzZIOFZXa3M

This is no joke !!!!!!!!!! To the best of my recollection, the Transfer Agent told me point blank that all the share certificates that Jack Cukjati issued were "invalid" because they were issued (signed & dated) on a date for which there were still 489+ million shares Outstanding out of 500 million Authorized. The company did not have the "authorization" to issue more shares of stock than were Authorized. This can be documented in much greater detail if need be in my opinion. Jack Cukjati was fined $1000 by a Texas judge for trying to quash the Transfer agent records that some Plaintiffs tried to subpoena.

In my opinion, this is no different than writing a bad check on an account for which you know there isn't enough funds to cover the check in my opinion. I believe Exobox issued millions of shares of stocks at a time when there weren't enough shares Authorized. See, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B605jwjqJxMlRHlOWkJEdkVtY2M


10/18/2010 - C734 - Jack Cukjati
10/18/2010 - C735 - Carl Ulepich
07/12/2011 - C ??? - Floyd Griffith
07/12/2011 - C1026 - Kristan Galik (attached as galikcert.pdf)
08/09/2011 - C1028 - David Tolin
11/18/2011 - C1012 - Theodore R Ernst
12/12/2011 - C ??? - Jeff Singer
01/06/2012 - C742 - Wai Lai Jr
04/09/2012 - C743 - Mark Hutton
05/17/2012 - C ??? - Leibowitz
10/20/2012 - C1030 - James P Kerrr (attached as KerrCert.pdf)
????????? - C ??? - Eric Cavanaugh



What happened to all the other issued shares of stock ranging between stock cert # C734 and C1030 ?????????????????

Again see, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B605jwjqJxMlRHlOWkJEdkVtY2M





According to current Exobox CEO Shaun Irvine:

"In regards to a current float and share count I cannot give an accurate number due to the prior CEO issuing shares for debts that are not accounted for other than in the accounting records(which are quite unorganized)."

See Email below...





----- Original Message -----
From: Shaun Irvine
To: ztsambis@bahasweb.com
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 11:34 AM
Subject: Re:


Hi Zachary,




In regards to a current float and share count I cannot give an accurate number due to the prior CEO issuing shares for debts that are not accounted for other than in the accounting records(which are quite unorganized). Once the accounting work is done I will have a more accurate number to give.


Touching on Suez, there's nothing in the accounting work, or anything else for that matter, that implies that Suez is no longer a 100 percent owned subsidiary. At face value, it does in fact appear that EXBX still owns that subsidiary.




Once accounting work is complete, and the appropriate filings have been filed there will be a shareholder meeting. Because of the moving parts and variables I am unable to give a date as to when to expect that shareholder meeting to be held.




I am aware that these answers are vague and don't give an exact answer, but I do hope that you can understand that what transpired over the past few years was not the cleanest operating company and that on our end we are doing every thing we can to correct the wrongs in order to move the company forward.




Hope all is well with you, I also hope you are not a Denver Bronco's fan, not because I dislike the Bronco's but because that must have been a tough game to watch if you are.


Best Regards,


Shaun Irvine
Chief Executive Officer
Exobox Technologies


(P) 949.945.8069





On Feb 3, 2014, at 7:18 AM, Zachary Tsambis <ztsambis@bahasweb.com> wrote:


Hi Shaun,

Any chance you can give me an updated outstanding share count and current float for EXBX ???

Also, is Suez Technologies still a 100% wholly shareholder-owned subsidiary of Exobox?

And are there any plans to hold a shareholder's meeting?


I think these are questions that you should be ok with answering.


Hope all is well !!

Thanks,


Zachary

----- Original Message -----
From: Shaun Irvine
To: ztsambis@bahasweb.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: Paul H. Kim - Counsel - American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC


Zachary,


I spoke with Myran Grey, the Relationship Manager of American Stock Transfer and have just confirmed that the particular stock certificate you speak of is in fact nonexistent according to AST records.


The amount outstanding is 510m with 500m issued.






Best Regards,


Shaun Irvine
Chief Executive Officer
Exobox Technologies


P: 949.945.8069