Potential revenues are insignificant?
Based on what? That comment alone shows you have done zero diligence. Moreover, yesterday you suggest atvi winnings are insignificant, today it's a windfall but your discounted value is absurdly low lol. Seems you want to argue and be right vs looking at actual facts. You are welcome to believe as you please no one here is selling based on nonsense when most have diligenced this a great deal.
Let's recap
- you have not even looked at atvi revenues and suggested the same yesterday that revenues were insignificant
- you have provided no math to back up your staments - laughable really
- we can all pull out nonsensical numbers from our behinds without any backup friend
I have suggested to you how to do the math - go re read that post and provide the data and sources to all those data points for us if you want to have a real discussion on value. My guess is you will ignore that, as those who like to talk down stocks seldom want to deal w real facts, they simply ignore such requests. None of us are new to that "game" friend. Please take the nonsense elsewhere if you cannot provide that data. If you can happy to review it- but again real data won't support your views so I know we won't see "real" data.
You are also wrong on the other infringers revenues.
You don't seem to provide any data / diligence with your views - most of us here actually understand the patents and market oppty here
- 5 years? Ok sure if they go to scotus and that's more like 2. Assuming they even get heard by scotus (atvi losing) which they wouldn't since there's no grounds.
- that being said, look at VHc- they haven't got a dime from Apple yet and their stock has seen incredible gains
Sorry wrong on many / all points yet again
But keep trying, how about showing some actual facts behind your nonsensical value? Like the points I laid out- let's back up views w hard numbers if you want to be taken seriously
My bet is you can't and won't since the real numbers can't get a value as low and silly as yours!
