InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 209
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/17/2016

Re: MrGold post# 483

Wednesday, 08/24/2016 1:38:38 PM

Wednesday, August 24, 2016 1:38:38 PM

Post# of 2841
Understood and thanks. So if they at one time increased to 400M in hopes of making a deal with another miner, but they used up the stock for other purposes, doesn't it now make sense that they'd want that 100M extra shares to get a partner to join in? A joint mining venture? If you were Newmont or Barrick or anyone wouldn't you want stock ownership before you joined with ECPN? Seems logical.

Thanks for the info on the ex employee. With the Internet anyone with a gripe about a former employer can make lots of noise. Guess that's what we have here.