InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 4156
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/23/2014

Re: fuagf post# 253904

Monday, 08/22/2016 9:19:16 PM

Monday, August 22, 2016 9:19:16 PM

Post# of 474050
Of all the bribes you claim, this is the one that bothers you the most.."Trump donated 35k to attorneys general who dropped Trump U. inquiries: report" In the story they state at the beginning, Trump donated to Abbott, three years after the alleged favor.

Contrast that to this bride to Clinton..."Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million."
"And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock."

The deal was strategically important to Mr. Putin, who shortly after the Americans gave their blessing sat down for a staged interview with Rosatom’s chief executive, Sergei Kiriyenko. “Few could have imagined in the past that we would own 20 percent of U.S. reserves,” Mr. Kiriyenko told Mr. Putin.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

To recap that as ridiculous as it sounds. You are bent with accusations of bribery over a 35k donation three years after the fact. But you see absolutely nothing nefarious about Clinton Foundation receiving 2.35 million from a group during the acquisition, and a direct 500k payment to the Clintons from a Russian investment banks linked to the Kremlin

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.