InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 2723
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/05/2004

Re: dougburkeaz post# 41170

Saturday, 08/20/2016 10:24:12 AM

Saturday, August 20, 2016 10:24:12 AM

Post# of 47075
Hi Doug

Consider including comparisons to constant weighted as well, 50/50 (or 80/20) yearly rebalanced back to 50/50 (80/20).

Where AIM shines is in its guidance against human nature. Left to your own and often investors will not profit take when high due to greed, nor buy when low due to fear. Comparing using AIM with not using AIM and after a few rounds of AIM having said 'I told you so' ... that's where its real benefit lies.

I recall AIM shouting BUY BUY! at/near the 2009 lows ... whilst on many other boards there were those capitulating out of stocks in fear of compounding the great 'losses' they'd already endured. I believe research shows that 'average' investors on average lag the 'average' by 2% annualised due to such bad behaviour. Obviously someone taking the counter side of such actions stands to benefit by 2% annualised (assuming like for like opposite trading).

Compared mathematically and as a broad average ... not much difference apparent. Its the in practice where the difference becomes much more evident.

Regards. Clive.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.