InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 826
Posts 119567
Boards Moderated 15
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: jmkobers post# 15812

Thursday, 08/18/2016 9:20:01 PM

Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:20:01 PM

Post# of 20689
Under that scenario, damages (but not treble damages) could be assessed; however, an Appellate Court reversal in this particular case is highly unlikely, IMO, because the arguments are simpler than in most drug-patent cases (and very much simpler than in the Lovenox patent case).

NVS/MNTA/MYL will argue that giving twice as much Copaxone half (approximately) as often is an obvious thing to try and hence is not a bona fide invention worthy of patent protection.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”