InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 617
Posts 27445
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 11/16/2007

Re: bar1080 post# 2463

Monday, 08/15/2016 12:36:38 AM

Monday, August 15, 2016 12:36:38 AM

Post# of 3158
I'm also a fan of SA. But, while most are good, I've found some articles to be highly inaccurate at times. In my experience it's important to read the comments along with the articles.

But, you don't have the diversity over there that you have here since the site is set up differently. The stock specific board set up here lends itself easily to roaming groups running stocks up. Those are the ones filling up the boards with the "to da moon" comments.

On SA, the problem I see the past few years is a growing number of short and distort articles that are absolutely devastating to the companies hit. I'm not confusing that with legitimate articles filled with fact that are outing scammy companies. But, too many are using the short and distort technique to make a few quick bucks shorting.

Did you notice that Chris Drose aka Bleecker Street admitted in a court filing that he didn't actually write his last article? Now, I have to wonder who wrote the rest?

I'm curious who or what group is writing while using fronts for authors. This is only an issue with the short and distort crowd over there. It will be interesting to see how SA handles this since it's only a matter of time before it is common knowledge.

Look at 5th comment from the bottom from Mind Boggling: http://seekingalpha.com/article/3984591-potential-niagen-health-benefits-drive-revenue-chromadex-stock






To follow KarinCA, click here then click "Follow This Member" under my photo.

Be kinder than necessary, for everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent WBA News