Sunday, August 14, 2016 5:19:45 PM
it's one of the following:
(1) NVS had an internal holding period of 10 years unless the partnership agreement was extended or dissolved or NVS had an interest in acquiring MNTA.
(2) NVS has determined the majority of MNTA's value doesn't relate to their partnership and as such, it doesn't make strategic sense to own MNTA equity as NVS can utilize the cash ($50+ million and capital gain losses) more opportunistically. Maybe they'll use the cash to acquire MNTA's interest in Glatopa and thrice weekly generic Copaxone.
Although, I find the selling annoying the fact NVS elected a 10b5-1 plan may mean they expect the share price to rise in the company months (thrice weekly approval?) and wanted to get the plan implemented prior to any approval.
10nis
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM