InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 86
Posts 12714
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/12/2010

Re: Protector post# 270069

Friday, 08/12/2016 4:35:13 AM

Friday, August 12, 2016 4:35:13 AM

Post# of 345746
Great post to make some understand that registered letters must be sent to Peregrine, SEC and Nasdaq to close this loophole or at least make damn sure all BOD can't say they were not aware of such a thing. CP, I also have been thinking what exactly would be in sealed SEC documents ...one being future royalties / payments made to UTSWM / Texas Board of Regents and since we know already we are not privy to the exact terms non-disclosed... is it possible that Authorized Shares could be part of future payments made to Texas Board of Regents or any other party?? and IF there were a RS and those authorized shares were not also split...then we could have another party having a big advantage in extra shares and voting ? I was trying to make sure all loopholes are closed in this registered letter ...

"Bavituximab is a first-in-class phosphatidylserine (PS)-targeting monoclonal antibody that is the cornerstone of a broad clinical
pipeline."
-- Big Pharmas nightmare... unless they are fortunate enough to have The Bavi Edge!

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News