InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 135
Posts 6894
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/01/2007

Re: copperslash post# 65973

Thursday, 08/11/2016 11:31:43 AM

Thursday, August 11, 2016 11:31:43 AM

Post# of 68424
Of course that would be why I used the word after citing the law suites; "regardless". because it's not exactly what I said too, it's what they did. And what they've been doing. FH is simply a step above their crowd funding scenario. Whenever the crowd is not interested they're using FH as the lender. Juxtaposition because these acquisitions can not obtain common funding, apparently not finically adequate to survive by their own means, dumped into FH where this acquires cash through discounted share dump.

Aug 8 reported the only reason for this so called, insider acquisition. To raise funds to increase their foot print.

This whole scenario is an insider transaction.

"expected to open several new locations through the remainder of 2016 and early 2017. XpresSpa anticipates increasing its number of total spa locations from 51 to more than 100 in the next few years. " WITH FH's loans and cash!

It could not have been said any clearer, fully disclosed and filed: "FH is juxtapositioned as a lender", verses investment.

worse, reportedly taking a small chuck of FH's holdings and share however, once fully vested it's almost 51%. to fact the outstanding will be from current 15 million to 29.

made further worse is, near 50% of the entire company's stock, it's not including the amount of stock they'll dump during the next few years for this: "from 51 to more than 100 in the next few years."

I.E. you're buying massive dilution for a company who obviously can NOT stand on their own two feet with 51 units, why would twice that make any difference at all?? Higher payroll and bonuses for insiders. .

Corn-fused-us Long-vestor ancient saying: Patience and small movements keep a steady course.

I don't have a humble opinion!


At's ma boy!