InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 122022
Next 10
Followers 54
Posts 6431
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/10/2014

Re: Condor65 post# 67003

Monday, 07/25/2016 4:23:46 PM

Monday, July 25, 2016 4:23:46 PM

Post# of 122022
Condor--Changed--yes for the worse

But the "why's" of that article are as relevant today--as I said

Although 3 years out of date, a more sober approach to the viability of hemp was considered in this article--although even the modest gains suggested have failed to materialize--the "whys" are still applicable.




Now as to the rest of the post:

The Commission now has the power to write the rules and approve them. What this means for Hemp, Inc. and its industrial hemp decortication facility, here in Spring Hope, is that we'll be able to possibly grow and harvest a very large hemp crop in the Spring of 2017 on up to 50,000 acres and process it at our plant.



There isn't 50,000 acres available if farmland to HEMP "around the plant" and the BIGGIE

50,000 acres when the plant (if it ever works) maximum processing is 3,000 acres???? What 17 years backup production LOL!

When the WHOLE COUNTRY is doing 4,000 acres--when CHINA the #1 producer is doing 150,000 acres?

Dave is back on the sauce again, dang it.

And you believe this, I bet. What a mess.