InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 744
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/12/2012

Re: exwannabe post# 268937

Monday, 07/25/2016 9:43:10 AM

Monday, July 25, 2016 9:43:10 AM

Post# of 345768
You are correct about the monoclonal Ab, but


the therapies mentioned by Vinmantoo, such as Xtandi and Tamoxifen, however, are hormonal treatments (not Mabs) often used in breast and prostate cancer.

As the use of these hormones are Standard of Care for various types of these cancers, how do you expect to prove that these adjunctive hormonal therapies make a difference with I/O 1.0 downstream inhibitors?

How do you separate out the effect of the adjunctive hormonal therapy from the actual chemo/radiation given for the breast or prostate cancer?

The answer is you can't. You would have to run trials with some patients receiving chemo only + anti-XYZ downstreamers and the other arm receiving chemo + anti-XYZ + adjunctive hormonal therapy, to see if the adjunctive hormonal therapy really made a difference.

But that's not the way those trials you cited are designed. And they CAN'T be designed that way, because that would entail a departure from SOC, leaving off the adjunctive hormonal therapy.

You can't do that.

You can't run a trial off SOC to prove adjunctive hormonal therapy synergizes with anti-XYZers. You can't.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News