Saturday, July 23, 2016 7:02:54 AM
PatB1
Rebranding in this case is not good. It doesn't have anything to do with whether it's 'working'. The fact is they infringed on another companies app and, although they tried to buy themselves out of it, the other company was asking for more than they were willing to give up ( the one thing that 1-eyed-jack was right about). Thus, they have to rebrand so they don't get sued for infringement. Let's be real here, guys. The company royally screwed the pooch. Not a good indication of a well managed company.
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=71892844
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $451,804 for the year ended December 31, 2015 versus $1,920 for the same period in 2014.
UPDATE,, THE .0030'S ARRRE HerRre NOW!! .000's Coming,, Again,, s.000n,, Now, because of this PR!!
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124032959
...so...sad...
Recent TTCM News
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM
