Saturday, July 09, 2016 8:49:22 AM
Airene told us before we hired her that Exobox's primary argument would be whether the shareholders met the number of shares to demand a vote.
I suggested we head that whole train off at the pass and submit affidavits of share ownership along with certifying letters from brokerage houses to prove ownership at the time of the first filing of the suit.
The shareholders came through big time with affidavits of shares and brokerage documentation enabling us to file as a group and demand a long overdue vote.
The problem is even after link ng Airenes pockets with cash she never submitted the share certification documentation which allowed Takos to challenge and eventually get our case thrown out.
This was a direct result of sloppy legal work.
The shareholders should be refunded the entire amount wasted on the case.
ALL IMHO. GLTA
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM