InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 10251
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/03/2008

Re: ntbiotech post# 952

Monday, 07/04/2016 5:06:12 PM

Monday, July 04, 2016 5:06:12 PM

Post# of 970
Not true. The removal from the Russell resulted in a 1 cent decline from the price 2 days before. Then, when the Supreme Court announced they were passing on the SQNM case, the plummet below $1 immediately started.

Removal from an index is advertised long in advance and market makers and arbitrage specialist set up in advance for the change, so that the actual day results in low volatility.

If a drop is needed before a recovery (I've never seen this discussed on any trading website before, so I'd like to hear where you have heard this from so I can research), perhaps we can drop to 50 cents, and then rise to 60 cents.

Bottom line, Sir Marty has been dead wrong on SQNM for over 5 years, and shows no sign of having a clue this year, just like any of the past 5!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.