Tuesday, June 21, 2016 11:42:33 AM
If an O/S of 635M "are good numbers", then was 578M barely a month ago better numbers?
Which must mean the 260M last October were super duper good? As opposed to the 239M in Feb 2015 being terrific? Obviously 15M in late 2014 after the 1:100 R/S from 1.5B must have been fantastic?
Only 4.8B more to go to get the O/S to match the 5.5B A/S. When the O/S gets to 1B, what adjective will be used for that number: "Sort of good", "Objectively satisfactory", or just simply "wonderful"?
Gotta luv these scams.
The Jewel of the Mind is Colored with the Hue of what it Imagines
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM