"...entities like Diomede and Maremanno and Ardee and Fribourg, etc show up in multiple public companies."
Another name that shows up is Curt Kramer. In addition, Reverse Splits seem to be part of the process. SpongeTech had announced an intention to execute a 1:100 R/S. The stated reason for the R/S was to uplist to Nasdaq. They delayed the implementation, but they maintained the required PPS for months, until after they finally received Wells Notices. Kramer held shares in SpongeTech through his Mazuma entity. Corporate counsel Joel Pensley claimed that some shares issued in his name were illegally diverted to Mazuma.
There was fairly recently a company that was denied the opportunity to execute a R/S because Bad Actor Curt Kramer was involved through his Asher entity, as I recall.
Maybe that is why WebSafety, whom you linked, executed a R/S a few months before Asher filed a beneficial ownership statement for 4.99% of WBSI.
Also, there are certainly other Europeans that should be named as Relief Defendants in the SpongeTech case. The IIROC case (moreso, you) named 7 Europeans who held accounts managed by Intertrust. However, Canaccord's RR Douglas Steer had a total of 13 such account holders. It's going to be very interesting to see if a second corporate trust services firm is named in connection with all of these transactions.
AI
