InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 64
Posts 27711
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/28/2008

Re: Patswil post# 340681

Saturday, 05/28/2016 11:52:26 AM

Saturday, May 28, 2016 11:52:26 AM

Post# of 793588
Using a newer computer which brought me to the linked submission

Our attorneys are fully using the now public documents to show the real reason for the sweep - the attitude of Treasury - the almost non existence of a counter party to Treasury in the FHFA - and to then wrap all that up as being in stark contrast to what the law allowed and intended

Very timely powerful presentation

Some of us understand that with the immunity clause some judges might choose the Lamberth path to hide behind such clause. Actually, I doubt if Lamberth in round one would have been ready to hide SUCH ACTIVITY behind the clause

Seriously increases my sense we should be able to get two of the three judges to reverse - send back - or at minimum ask for the (non existent) administrative record

all should read this link from Patswil