InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[mickeybritt]

Just my opinion!!!!


A patent infringement is not a criminal trial where new evidence

might be brought up in an appeal. The evidence in infringing

has to be pretty clear and it isn't going to change on appeal

you are either using the technology or you are not. The only thing

that can alter is if the patents are invalidated. Huawei is

been found guilty of infringing in every arbitration and getting

it overturned should be a impossibility. Since they in my opinion

are using the same technology in China they have been using in

products they sold outside of China. Therefore its not a matter

of if you are infringing the patents but what rate will be

agreed on for a Chinese rate and then back payment money for

Chinese sales will then be added to the world wide sales.

I say it again to the best of my knowledge I have never heard of

yep the arbitrations have all ruled against me and I am going

to commence paying installments but I am considering appealing

again. Why did IDCC accept installments when a court had wanted

a bond posted? My opinion is a full agreement has been done on

international sales and it will not be appealed or IDCC is ran

by damn fools to agree to a installment pay. If a agreement has

been entered into and the final agreement will be done once the

Chinese rate is established.


If what I say is true one would think that IDCC will have to

account for the money received and not be in a deferred account.

That is why I am pissed at the company for non disclosure of what

is or has happened with the arbitration ruling. If they have

already agreed on international sales then that installment

money should be accountable NOW.


JMO
Mickey