InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 2262
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/12/2014

Re: None

Tuesday, 05/24/2016 3:28:18 AM

Tuesday, May 24, 2016 3:28:18 AM

Post# of 49370
"Did you even read what you posted??? LMAO!!!

One item is about real estate! SMH!

Quote:2. The provisions of subdivision one of this section shall not apply to a corporation, the principal asset of which shall be the ownership of a one or two family dwelling, where it appears either that the said corporation was organized and created...

You do understand that this has absolutely nothing to do with the the KBM loan.

As well as item 3 that you posted. Truly amazing. "


So in other words you really don't understand number 2 is an exception to what you copied and pasted which of course has nothing to do with the KBM loan. That being that a corporation may not impose a defense of usuary, and number 3 clearly states a corporation may in fact impose a defense of CRIMINAL USUARY which does have to do with the KBM loan. Just like you're trying to make others believe HJOE doesn't make any money from the LTCG chips when in fact they do. They are the one who negotiated the deal in the first place. I really feel sorry for you.

That is not truly amazing to me that you don't understand it. Rather it's what I expected of you.Looks like a whole group I showed it to is laughing about it. But don't worry rest assured their not laughing with you they are ALL laughing at you.

3. The provisions of subdivision one of this section shall not apply
to any action in which a corporation interposes a defense of criminal
usury as described in section 190.40 of the penal law.

http://yonkerspolice.org/penal.law/article190.htm#p190.42

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.